From ocl at gih.com Tue Aug 1 14:59:49 2017 From: ocl at gih.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Olivier_MJ_Cr=c3=a9pin-Leblond?=) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 15:59:49 +0200 Subject: [IPv6crawler-wg] IPv6 Matrix July 2017 results Message-ID: Hello everyone, this is just to let you know that I have managed to get another full run of the IPv6 Matrix going and the results are now displayed on http://www.ipv6matrix.org The last full run was as far back as November 2016. Since then we have suffered from hardware failure, twice, and then we had to shut down the servers again in the middle of a .COM run (which takes over a month to complete) and both machines were physically but successfully moved elsewhere. They are about 8 or 9 years old and have run continuously since 2010, so we're dealing with rugged veterans by now. Thanks to Lance Draper from the University of Southampton for having been kind to the servers. We also looked at the possibility of virtualising both servers, but this would require one or more people who are versed in Python, Json, SQLite, Centos 5.0 and Ubuntu to port the various bits of script and software to the virtual package. It is complex work and although we have a little bit of funding left over at Southampton University, nobody has so far stepped forward to the challenge. Let me know if you know anyone that would be interested. On the results themselves, I haven't had a change to go through them in detail yet but the main surprise is the lack of global increase in uptake of IPv6 in information providers. It looks like the early adopters have implemented dual stack but there is still a long way to go. Kindest regards, Olivier -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Tim.Chown at jisc.ac.uk Wed Aug 2 12:07:05 2017 From: Tim.Chown at jisc.ac.uk (Tim Chown) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 11:07:05 +0000 Subject: [IPv6crawler-wg] IPv6 Matrix July 2017 results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Olivier, This looks good, thanks for the update. It? still the best-looking visualisation tool for IPv6 adoption! I?m still a Visiting Fellow at Southampton, so can try again to advertise for good student(s) to take on the virtualisation task. I don?t really know the effort that would be involved, in detail. Do we not have contacts with companies providing virtualisation solutions who might do it pro-bono for ISOC? Odd the take-up hasn?t grown, esp. with the recent default provision of IPv6 on Cloudflare. Tim > On 1 Aug 2017, at 14:59, Olivier MJ Cr?pin-Leblond wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > this is just to let you know that I have managed to get another full run of the IPv6 Matrix going and the results are now displayed on http://www.ipv6matrix.org > > The last full run was as far back as November 2016. Since then we have suffered from hardware failure, twice, and then we had to shut down the servers again in the middle of a .COM run (which takes over a month to complete) and both machines were physically but successfully moved elsewhere. They are about 8 or 9 years old and have run continuously since 2010, so we're dealing with rugged veterans by now. Thanks to Lance Draper from the University of Southampton for having been kind to the servers. > > We also looked at the possibility of virtualising both servers, but this would require one or more people who are versed in Python, Json, SQLite, Centos 5.0 and Ubuntu to port the various bits of script and software to the virtual package. It is complex work and although we have a little bit of funding left over at Southampton University, nobody has so far stepped forward to the challenge. > > Let me know if you know anyone that would be interested. > > On the results themselves, I haven't had a change to go through them in detail yet but the main surprise is the lack of global increase in uptake of IPv6 in information providers. It looks like the early adopters have implemented dual stack but there is still a long way to go. > > Kindest regards, > > Olivier From omer.hamid at btinternet.com Thu Aug 3 22:56:25 2017 From: omer.hamid at btinternet.com (Chelsea Thomson) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 06:56:25 +0900 Subject: [IPv6crawler-wg] =?utf-8?q?what_a_beautiful_surprise?= Message-ID: <1260868993.20170803235625@btinternet.com> Dear friend! I've been looking through latest news when I've just come across that beautiful thing, it was a real surprise for me, check it out http://bit.do/dEoFy Warmly, Chelsea Thomson From: IPv6crawler-wg [mailto:IPv6crawler-wg at gih.com] Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2017 4:56 PM To: omer.hamid at btinternet.com Subject: so edgy Yeah, my writing is a lot better than when I started. For one, I don't put characters' thoughts in quotations anymore. Before I started this, I had only written about 20,000 words of my first novel. Those sections had to be heavily edited. My writing has gotten better. I'd loved to get published, but from everything I hear, you basically have to know someone in the industry. And if we're being honest, I'm probably not good enough to compete with most of those people that are trying to get published themselves. If I had my way, my self-published books will be at the top of the best seller's lists. The other thing about being published is that I don't like losing that creative control. Often times the tiniest detail in my stories actually means something, and it would be all but too easy for a publisher to really screw up some major, if not clandestine, parts of my book. If you're reading one of my stories, chances are something isn't quite what it seems. It could be miniscule, it could be important to the plot, but I like to "hide" a lot of things in my stories. My short stories I don't always do this in, but my novels have a lot of this. I like to give meaningful names too. Know what the name means, you might know something important to the story. So ultimately, I would love to be published. If I could, I would be. But I don't think I even stand much of a chance. But self-publishing will hopefully be fun, and if only a few people are reading my books, that's more than I ever thought would. I hated writing growing up. It wasn't until I started writing fiction that I learned to love it. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 591977A3B7168497.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 13284 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ocl at gih.com Sat Aug 5 15:24:43 2017 From: ocl at gih.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Olivier_MJ_Cr=c3=a9pin-Leblond?=) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 16:24:43 +0200 Subject: [IPv6crawler-wg] IPv6 Matrix July 2017 results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1302ecc1-2147-a59e-4300-a79a6462e1dc@gih.com> Dear Tim, On 02/08/2017 13:07, Tim Chown wrote: > I?m still a Visiting Fellow at Southampton, so can try again to advertise for good student(s) to take on the virtualisation task. I don?t really know the effort that would be involved, in detail. Do we not have contacts with companies providing virtualisation solutions who might do it pro-bono for ISOC? Lance Draper had a hoster ready to host. But the hoster did not have a Team to do the actual work of virtualisation. > > Odd the take-up hasn?t grown, esp. with the recent default provision of IPv6 on Cloudflare. The figures are for the take-up overall which includes the Nameserver. Domains from Cloudflare fronted Web sites were probably already marked as using IPv6 since the DNS from Cloudflare as been dual stack for a long while. Filtering by service type WWW only, one can see strong growth in the UK to 2.8%, Globally 9%. Looking at the figures given by Google and others, who appear to point at much higher levels of spread of IPv6, we appear to have very conservative figures. That said, looking around me, whether in the UK, Switzerland, France or elsewhere, I still see very little use of IPv6, thus at a global penetration of 9% for WWW we might well be more accurate on the trend. Ultimately, the more I look at our results as well as those of other researchers, the more I think this is not exact science. Kindest regards, Olivier -- Olivier MJ Cr?pin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From omer.hamid at btinternet.com Wed Aug 9 13:19:30 2017 From: omer.hamid at btinternet.com (Susie Ivey) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 12:19:30 +0000 Subject: [IPv6crawler-wg] =?utf-8?q?interesting?= Message-ID: <1251598847.20170809141930@btinternet.com> Hi, There is something really interesting I wanted to show you, I think this stuff is really amazing. Please take a look https://clck.ru/BazoW See you around, Susie Ivey From ocl at gih.com Wed Aug 16 14:17:59 2017 From: ocl at gih.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Olivier_MJ_Cr=c3=a9pin-Leblond?=) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:17:59 +0200 Subject: [IPv6crawler-wg] Fwd: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Fwd: rate-limiting-of-ipv6-traceroutes-is-widespread In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello all, an interesting deck of slides regarding rate limiting of IPv6 traceroutes. As the IPv6 Matrix performs a lot of traceroutes, this might explain the lack of reachability of certain parts of the IPv6 Internet through traceroute. Kindest regards, Olivier -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] Fwd: rate-limiting-of-ipv6-traceroutes-is-widespread Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:56:27 +0400 From: Daniel Shaw Reply-To: IPv6 in Africa Discussions To: IPv6 in Africa Discussions Interesting slides. May be of interest to some. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/materials/slides-99-maprg-rate-limiting-of-ipv6-traceroutes-is-widespread-measurements-and-mitigations _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From omer.hamid at btinternet.com Wed Aug 23 10:29:07 2017 From: omer.hamid at btinternet.com (Doris Overstreet) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 13:29:07 +0400 Subject: [IPv6crawler-wg] =?utf-8?q?=E2=9C=89Re=3A_The_Quick_Start_Guide?= Message-ID: <001045c5e025$a1a7316d$0798b760$@btinternet.com> Hi! If you think bodyweight workouts are too easy wait until you try these full body fat burning circuits! My 12-week at home or on the road system will fire up your metabolism and target all your problem areas (flabby legs, saggy butt, puffy tummy and shapeless arms) to keep you lean & defined without the need for any weights or expensive equipment. Check it out http://ejfox.com/precious.php?McNcRhVT -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: